Triple

T30570933
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug E778118 entity
Predicate companionsDuringTreasureHunt P183507 FINISHED
Object William Legrand NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: William Legrand | Statement: [Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug, companionsDuringTreasureHunt, William Legrand]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: companionsDuringTreasureHunt
Context triple: [Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug, companionsDuringTreasureHunt, William Legrand]
  • A. trineCompanions
    Indicates that two entities are companions whose relationship is characterized by a harmonious or complementary trine-like alignment.
  • B. companionsCategory
    Indicates that one entity is classified under a specific category related to companions or companionship.
  • C. treasureInvolved
    Indicates that a situation, event, or action involves or is related to treasure in some significant way.
  • D. hasNumberOfCompanions
    Indicates the quantity of companions or associates that an entity has.
  • E. searchCompanions
    Indicates that an entity looks for or seeks out other entities to accompany or assist it.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2249f8c148190ae7eb3912cde112a completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7a01efcc08190bba489a9099b8684 completed May 3, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f79e4888248190be2f63cdfb5cd7b7 completed May 3, 2026, 7:13 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f79f477c4c8190a35cb6d87b1dcbd1 completed May 3, 2026, 7:17 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:22 p.m.