Triple
T30570907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug |
E778118
|
entity |
| Predicate | acquaintedWith |
P53758
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jupiter |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jupiter | Statement: [Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug, acquaintedWith, Jupiter]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: acquaintedWith Context triple: [Unnamed narrator of The Gold-Bug, acquaintedWith, Jupiter]
-
A.
acquaintanceOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity knows another in a casual or non-intimate way, without implying close friendship or strong personal ties.
-
B.
knownBefore
Indicates that one entity had knowledge or awareness of another entity or event prior to a specified time or before another referenced event occurred.
-
C.
knownIn
Indicates that an entity is recognized, acknowledged, or familiar within a particular context, domain, or group.
-
D.
knownToBe
Indicates that one entity is recognized or acknowledged as being a certain way, having a certain property, or fitting a particular description by others.
-
E.
knows
Indicates that one entity has knowledge or awareness of another entity or piece of information.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2249f8c148190ae7eb3912cde112a |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f68912596881908b658c3082856c7e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 11:30 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f67e42d6688190b60e91d2c388c555 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:22 p.m.