Triple
T3055396
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mysterium fidei |
E60467
|
entity |
| Predicate | defendsDoctrineAgainst |
P36588
|
FINISHED |
| Object | symbolic interpretations of the Eucharist |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: symbolic interpretations of the Eucharist | Statement: [Mysterium fidei, defendsDoctrineAgainst, symbolic interpretations of the Eucharist]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: defendsDoctrineAgainst Context triple: [Mysterium fidei, defendsDoctrineAgainst, symbolic interpretations of the Eucharist]
-
A.
deniesDoctrine
Indicates that one entity rejects, opposes, or refuses to accept the truth or validity of a particular doctrine associated with another entity.
-
B.
clarifiedDoctrineOn
Indicates that one entity has provided a more precise, authoritative, or detailed explanation of a doctrine concerning another entity.
-
C.
disputedDoctrine
Indicates that a particular doctrine, teaching, or belief is contested or not universally accepted between parties.
-
D.
theologicalDefenseBy
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity provides a theological justification, argument, or defense on behalf of another entity, doctrine, or position.
-
E.
confirmedDoctrine
Indicates that an authority has officially validated, endorsed, or ratified a particular doctrine as true or acceptable.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8578137c81908259dcb27c7d6d7c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9bf6b9948190bc957bfd1579c471 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad962326e081909d5521c3d3ea3158 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:02 p.m.