Triple
T3053183
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Le Régiment de Sambre-et-Meuse |
E60417
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDisputedAspect |
P14608
|
FINISHED |
| Object | authorship attribution |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authorship attribution | Statement: [Le Régiment de Sambre-et-Meuse, hasDisputedAspect, authorship attribution]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisputedAspect Context triple: [Le Régiment de Sambre-et-Meuse, hasDisputedAspect, authorship attribution]
-
A.
disputedAspect
chosen
Indicates that a particular feature, detail, or component of something is subject to disagreement or contention between parties.
-
B.
hasDisputedStatus
Indicates that the status or classification of something is contested, uncertain, or not universally agreed upon.
-
C.
hasDisputedStatusWith
Indicates that there is a contested or unresolved status, claim, or standing between the related entities.
-
D.
hasDisputedCircumscription
Indicates that there is disagreement or uncertainty about how the boundaries or scope of something are formally defined or delimited.
-
E.
statusDisputedBy
Indicates that the validity, accuracy, or recognition of a status is being challenged or contested by a specified party.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8578137c81908259dcb27c7d6d7c |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:19 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9bf3c52c8190bbe8e5cb98c21715 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad962195388190856013a2519c2b0f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.