Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Statement: [Civil Rights Act of 1964, upheldByCourtCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

Target entity: Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
Context triple: [Civil Rights Act of 1964, upheldByCourtCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

• A. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States chosen
  Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by affirming Congress’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause.
• B. Browder v. Gayle
  Browder v. Gayle was the landmark 1956 federal court case that declared bus segregation in Montgomery, Alabama unconstitutional, effectively ending the Montgomery bus boycott and striking a major blow against Jim Crow laws.
• C. Katzenbach v. McClung
  Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
• D. Craig v. Boren
  Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
• E. Sweatt v. Painter
  Sweatt v. Painter was a landmark 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged racial segregation in higher education and helped lay the groundwork for Brown v. Board of Education.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: upheldByCourtCase
Context triple: [Civil Rights Act of 1964, upheldByCourtCase, Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States]

• A. upheldBy chosen
  Indicates that one entity is supported, maintained, or validated by another, often through approval, enforcement, or confirmation of its validity.
• B. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• C. notableSupremeCourtCase
  Indicates that a legal case is recognized as a significant or influential decision by the Supreme Court.
• D. declaredUnconstitutionalInCase
  Indicates that a law, policy, or action was ruled unconstitutional in a specific legal case.
• E. incorporatedByCase
  Indicates that one legal case formally incorporates, adopts, or integrates the content, reasoning, or outcome of another case.
• F. None of above.