Triple

T30503259
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Quedagh Merchant E776195 entity
Predicate legalStatusAtCapture P196247 FINISHED
Object controversial prize LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: controversial prize | Statement: [Quedagh Merchant, legalStatusAtCapture, controversial prize]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusAtCapture
Context triple: [Quedagh Merchant, legalStatusAtCapture, controversial prize]
  • A. legalStatusAtDiscovery
    Indicates the legal status or condition of an entity at the specific time it was discovered or first identified.
  • B. legalStatusAtIssue
    Indicates that the legal status of an entity is the central subject of dispute, consideration, or determination in a legal context.
  • C. legalStatusAtArrival
    Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held at the time it first arrived at a particular place or jurisdiction.
  • D. legalStatusAtApproval
    Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held at the time it was formally approved.
  • E. legalStatusAtDeparture
    Indicates the legal status or condition an entity holds at the time it departs from a specified place or jurisdiction.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22498c5d481908aaea89e6fab8280 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe189fec148190aeef51b417ba15b0 completed May 8, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe17285b0881908de7569d8dbd20bd completed May 8, 2026, 5:02 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fe189f2ea48190b8c4718f1353970e completed May 8, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:15 p.m.