Triple

T30502250
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Exchange Traded Commodity E776166 entity
Predicate hasPrimaryRisk P149293 FINISHED
Object commodity price risk LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: commodity price risk | Statement: [Exchange Traded Commodity, hasPrimaryRisk, commodity price risk]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasPrimaryRisk
Context triple: [Exchange Traded Commodity, hasPrimaryRisk, commodity price risk]
  • A. hasRiskFor
    Indicates that one entity is susceptible or exposed to the possibility of experiencing a harmful event, condition, or outcome associated with another entity.
  • B. hasRiskStatus
    Indicates the level or category of risk currently associated with an entity.
  • C. hasRiskFrom
    Indicates that one entity is exposed to or may suffer potential harm, loss, or adverse effects as a result of another entity.
  • D. hasRiskFactorFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity contributes to or increases the likelihood of another entity experiencing a particular risk or adverse outcome.
  • E. hasPrimary
    Indicates that one entity is designated as the main or most important instance (the primary) in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22498c5d481908aaea89e6fab8280 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffecdcbac4819093b725a7dbe0e61b completed May 10, 2026, 2:26 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffec3633288190adbbd84e277708dc completed May 10, 2026, 2:23 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:15 p.m.