Triple

T3048466
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bohr–Einstein debates E83508 entity
Predicate BohrPosition P45329 FINISHED
Object defense of Copenhagen interpretation LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense of Copenhagen interpretation | Statement: [Bohr–Einstein debates, BohrPosition, defense of Copenhagen interpretation]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: BohrPosition
Context triple: [Bohr–Einstein debates, BohrPosition, defense of Copenhagen interpretation]
  • A. positionB
    Indicates that one entity occupies or is located at a specific position relative to another entity.
  • B. positionInPeriodicTable
    Indicates the placement or location of a chemical element within the structure of the periodic table.
  • C. positionA
    Indicates the spatial or ordered position of an entity A within a defined reference frame or sequence.
  • D. positionOn
    Indicates that one entity is located on top of or at a specific place along the surface or extent of another entity.
  • E. hasAtomicRadius
    Indicates that an entity possesses a specific atomic radius value, representing the size of its atoms.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b24924c8190a9bb6f61d519e4ae completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9baed3848190a8351d9c8c4edc79 completed March 8, 2026, 3:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad962195388190856013a2519c2b0f completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69ad9b272a408190ba0ce09bdeea76c9 completed March 8, 2026, 3:52 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.