Triple

T3044633
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crossbow E83414 entity
Predicate hasDisadvantageComparedTo P7340 FINISHED
Object longbow in rate of fire LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: longbow in rate of fire | Statement: [Crossbow, hasDisadvantageComparedTo, longbow in rate of fire]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDisadvantageComparedTo
Context triple: [Crossbow, hasDisadvantageComparedTo, longbow in rate of fire]
  • A. disadvantage chosen
    Indicates that one entity is in a less favorable, weaker, or hindered position relative to another in a given context.
  • B. hasLessFinancialPowersThan
    Indicates that one entity’s authority or capacity to make financial decisions or control financial resources is lower or more limited than that of another entity.
  • C. opposedQualityTo
    Indicates that one quality stands in direct opposition or contrast to another quality.
  • D. weakerThan
    Indicates that one entity has less strength, power, or effectiveness than another entity.
  • E. hasTradeoff
    Indicates that one option or outcome involves a compromise in which gaining certain benefits requires accepting corresponding costs or disadvantages.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b24924c8190a9bb6f61d519e4ae completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9b602ed881909a72662eb544866b completed March 8, 2026, 3:53 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad961fc62c819087c4c3a44b00847d completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.