Triple
T30443381
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | UEFA regulations |
E774512
|
entity |
| Predicate | allowAppealTo |
P17875
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Court of Arbitration for Sport |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Court of Arbitration for Sport | Statement: [UEFA regulations, allowAppealTo, Court of Arbitration for Sport]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: allowAppealTo Context triple: [UEFA regulations, allowAppealTo, Court of Arbitration for Sport]
-
A.
canBeAppealedTo
chosen
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
-
B.
appeal
Indicates that one party formally requests a higher authority to review, reconsider, or overturn a prior decision, judgment, or outcome.
-
C.
mayGrantLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that an authority has the power or discretion to allow a party to proceed with an appeal.
-
D.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
E.
appealBeyond
Indicates that something has significance, relevance, or attractiveness that extends beyond a specified scope, group, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22493ef9c8190ae8c2afcb7f994c8 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7886be6d8819095ec62e4f2cee858 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7841440f48190b4346c08855951d2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:08 p.m.