Triple
T3042553
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Northern Uto-Aztecan |
E83164
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSubgroup |
P747
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Taracahitic |
E79962
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Taracahitic | Statement: [Northern Uto-Aztecan, hasSubgroup, Taracahitic]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Taracahitic Context triple: [Northern Uto-Aztecan, hasSubgroup, Taracahitic]
-
A.
Taracahitic
chosen
Taracahitic is a proposed subgroup of the Uto-Aztecan language family that includes several indigenous languages once spoken in northwestern Mexico.
-
B.
Rarámuri language
The Rarámuri language is an indigenous Uto-Aztecan language spoken by the Tarahumara (Rarámuri) people of northern Mexico.
-
C.
Patamona language
The Patamona language is an indigenous Cariban language spoken by the Patamona people of the Guiana Highlands in Guyana and northern Brazil.
-
D.
Tataviam language
The Tataviam language is an extinct Uto-Aztecan language once spoken by the Tataviam people in what is now Southern California.
-
E.
Kapingamarangi language
The Kapingamarangi language is a Polynesian outlier language spoken primarily on Kapingamarangi Atoll in the Federated States of Micronesia.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b2298908190a7cb4e9bdbf064d0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9b5d2a308190b4ce20efcae9b761 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:53 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b1ded35e008190be7dd72aa7537a3b |
completed | March 11, 2026, 9:29 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:01 p.m.