Triple

T30416428
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Chichester Service E773768 entity
Predicate hasCanonicalSection P195726 FINISHED
Object Magnificat NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Magnificat | Statement: [Chichester Service, hasCanonicalSection, Magnificat]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCanonicalSection
Context triple: [Chichester Service, hasCanonicalSection, Magnificat]
  • A. hasSectionWith
    Indicates that an entity contains or includes a specific section that satisfies certain conditions or characteristics.
  • B. hasSectionOn
    Indicates that one entity (typically a document or resource) contains a dedicated section or part that specifically addresses or discusses another entity or topic.
  • C. hasSectionIn
    Indicates that one entity contains or includes another entity as a section or subdivision within it.
  • D. hasCanonicalReference
    Indicates that one entity serves as the authoritative or standard reference source for another entity.
  • E. hasCanonicalCategory
    Indicates that something is associated with its standard or officially recognized category within a classification system.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22490b8b48190ab10c886a8d58c89 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fde49a084081909d99b1e0258169d5 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fde1d04bd881909a46ecbbf18dfe59 completed May 8, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fde49953c481909ac352ab36fa9ff2 completed May 8, 2026, 1:26 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:05 p.m.