Triple

T30405446
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Mac OS X on Intel E773464 entity
Predicate laterCoexistsWith P198416 FINISHED
Object macOS on Apple silicon LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: macOS on Apple silicon | Statement: [Mac OS X on Intel, laterCoexistsWith, macOS on Apple silicon]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterCoexistsWith
Context triple: [Mac OS X on Intel, laterCoexistsWith, macOS on Apple silicon]
  • A. laterCorrespondsTo
    Indicates that one entity corresponds to, matches, or is the counterpart of another entity that occurs or is defined at a later time or stage.
  • B. existedAfter
    Indicates that one entity came into existence only after another entity already existed.
  • C. laterExtendedIn
    Indicates that an existing entity (such as a work, version, or specification) was subsequently expanded, updated, or built upon by a later entity.
  • D. laterBasedOn
    Indicates that one event, state, or version occurs or is established after another, using the earlier one as its basis or reference point.
  • E. laterComplementedBy
    Indicates that an earlier entity is subsequently supplemented, enhanced, or completed by a later entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2248facd48190b183c3f3ca6daef7 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fee25dbca481909e6f1c255122b3a8 completed May 9, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fee1c8915c8190b08b63e42881f1a9 completed May 9, 2026, 7:27 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fee25c7c548190a2c6e50074a33da4 completed May 9, 2026, 7:29 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 8:03 p.m.