Triple

T30303362
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Amonasro E770708 entity
Predicate relationshipToAmneris P203870 FINISHED
Object political enemy of Amneris’s people LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political enemy of Amneris’s people | Statement: [Amonasro, relationshipToAmneris, political enemy of Amneris’s people]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToAmneris
Context triple: [Amonasro, relationshipToAmneris, political enemy of Amneris’s people]
  • A. relationshipToRadamès
    Indicates the specific type of personal or social relationship an entity has with Radamès.
  • B. associatedWithPharaoh
    Indicates a relationship in which an entity has a connection, link, or involvement with a pharaoh, such as through service, rule, influence, or historical association.
  • C. relationshipToAmina
    Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has with Amina.
  • D. marriedToPharaoh
    Indicates that one entity is the spouse of a pharaoh in a marital relationship.
  • E. motherOfPharaoh
    Indicates that one entity is the mother (biological or adoptive) of another entity who holds the title or role of pharaoh.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f224881b948190b8c4921b250a44a3 completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a022c5269888190944314074aedfe73 completed May 11, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a02286020308190b238183f7ba2065f completed May 11, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a022c51bd5c81909e9bf265bf39cd24 completed May 11, 2026, 7:21 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:49 p.m.