Triple

T3023176
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kathy Lacey E82510 entity
Predicate associatedIssue P11722 FINISHED
Object polite society’s complicity in discrimination LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: polite society’s complicity in discrimination | Statement: [Kathy Lacey, associatedIssue, polite society’s complicity in discrimination]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedIssue
Context triple: [Kathy Lacey, associatedIssue, polite society’s complicity in discrimination]
  • A. involvesIssue
    Indicates that an action, event, or entity is related to, concerns, or includes a particular issue.
  • B. hasTargetIssue chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or directed toward a specific issue, problem, or concern as its focus.
  • C. knownIssue
    Indicates that the subject has an issue or problem that is already identified, recognized, or documented.
  • D. issueType
    Indicates the specific category or classification assigned to an issue within a tracking or management context.
  • E. raisesIssue
    Indicates that one entity brings up, reports, or formally submits a concern, problem, or topic for attention to another entity or system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1fb34081908c1b873e2b7273e1 completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad9ab8e0a48190ac79e674abd181cf completed March 8, 2026, 3:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad961c430c8190ac48f2e3c7e7c649 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3 p.m.