Triple

T302074
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Case White E6218 entity
Predicate casusBelli P11284 FINISHED
Object German claims of Polish aggression LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German claims of Polish aggression | Statement: [Case White, casusBelli, German claims of Polish aggression]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: casusBelli
Context triple: [Case White, casusBelli, German claims of Polish aggression]
  • A. militaryConflict
    Indicates a relationship where two or more parties are engaged in organized, armed hostilities or warfare against each other.
  • B. conflictBelligerent
    Indicates that an entity is a participating belligerent (e.g., a country, group, or force) in a specific conflict.
  • C. majorWar
    Indicates a large-scale, intense armed conflict between major powers or involving substantial military forces and widespread impact.
  • D. warfareType
    Indicates the specific kind or category of warfare that characterizes a given conflict or military engagement.
  • E. opposingForce
    Indicates a relationship where one entity actively resists, counters, or works against the actions, goals, or influence of another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79230508190b912ecb555aae17e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea2fba548190a5aeb1597dca96bd completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e93c367881908d3f6e2b81d44d7f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea2af1388190b93235602ace679e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.