Triple
T30190442
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alabama hill country |
E767461
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativeToState |
P169925
|
FINISHED |
| Object | more rugged than central and southern Alabama |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: more rugged than central and southern Alabama | Statement: [Alabama hill country, relativeToState, more rugged than central and southern Alabama]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeToState Context triple: [Alabama hill country, relativeToState, more rugged than central and southern Alabama]
-
A.
relativeToEvent
Indicates that something is defined, measured, or interpreted in relation to a specific event as its reference point.
-
B.
referenceState
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a reference or baseline state against which another entity’s state is defined, compared, or interpreted.
-
C.
relativePosition
Indicates the spatial relationship of one entity’s location with respect to another entity’s position.
-
D.
isRelativeTo
Indicates that one entity has a familial or kinship relationship to another entity.
-
E.
hasRelativeNaturalState
Indicates that an entity is associated with a default or inherent condition it naturally tends to be in.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2247cc3d88190811dec3face94bf5 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a020ec13d808190b41acdc31adc4191 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 5:15 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a020d9259c08190ad0370091c23ea8a |
completed | May 11, 2026, 5:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:28 p.m.