Triple

T30134166
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tobias Haslinger E765938 entity
Predicate familyRelationTypeWithCarl Haslinger P178613 FINISHED
Object father LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: father | Statement: [Tobias Haslinger, familyRelationTypeWithCarl Haslinger, father]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: familyRelationTypeWithCarl Haslinger
Context triple: [Tobias Haslinger, familyRelationTypeWithCarl Haslinger, father]
  • A. familyOf
    Indicates a familial relationship exists between the entities, such as by blood, marriage, or adoption.
  • B. relationshipTypeWithJohnHartigan
    Indicates the specific nature or category of relationship that an entity has with John Hartigan.
  • C. worksInCloseRelationshipWith
    Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
  • D. familyRelationToCharltons
    Indicates the type of familial relationship an entity has to the Charltons.
  • E. hasRelationshipTypeWith Alexandra Bergson
    Indicates that there exists a specific type or category of relationship between an entity and Alexandra Bergson.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22477d1a081908df2b7e6ed16859d completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7117e55908190a67105e92bc4830f completed May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f70f380690819090cc34763ba460ed completed May 3, 2026, 9:02 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7117cf2188190b29e36fc1e342c60 completed May 3, 2026, 9:12 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:16 p.m.