Triple

T30131521
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Red Forest E765857 entity
Predicate dominantTreeSpeciesBeforeAccident P80238 FINISHED
Object Scots pine NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Scots pine | Statement: [Red Forest, dominantTreeSpeciesBeforeAccident, Scots pine]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dominantTreeSpeciesBeforeAccident
Context triple: [Red Forest, dominantTreeSpeciesBeforeAccident, Scots pine]
  • A. hasScientificNameOfDominantTree
    Indicates the scientific (Latin) name of the tree species that is dominant in a given area or context.
  • B. originalTreeFell
    Indicates that the initially existing or primary tree has fallen down from its standing position.
  • C. notableTreeSpecies
    Indicates that the subject place or area is known for, or characterized by, the specified tree species.
  • D. dominantTreeCommonName chosen
    Indicates the common (non-scientific) name of the tree species that is dominant in a given area or ecological context.
  • E. dominantTree
    Indicates that one tree has a dominant or prevailing influence over another tree, such as in size, canopy coverage, or competitive advantage within a shared environment.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f22477d1a081908df2b7e6ed16859d completed April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f727afd5d88190ad48735cd1b32787 completed May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72737c42c8190a3f781a5e98868ff completed May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 7:15 p.m.