Triple
T30040139
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Slippin’ Around |
E763274
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAnswerSong |
P140140
|
FINISHED |
| Object | I’ll Never Slip Around Again |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: I’ll Never Slip Around Again | Statement: [Slippin’ Around, hasAnswerSong, I’ll Never Slip Around Again]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAnswerSong Context triple: [Slippin’ Around, hasAnswerSong, I’ll Never Slip Around Again]
-
A.
isAnswerSongTo
chosen
Indicates that one song was created as a direct response or reply to another specific song.
-
B.
hasSong
Indicates that one entity possesses, features, or includes a particular song.
-
C.
hasSongAbout
Indicates that one entity has created, features, or is associated with a song whose subject or theme is about another entity.
-
D.
hasSpecialSong
Indicates that one entity possesses or is associated with a particular song that is unique, distinctive, or specially designated for it.
-
E.
hasSignatureSong
Indicates that an artist or performer is especially associated with a particular song that is widely recognized as their defining or most iconic work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246fb2b88190acff36bf7975c8f0 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:32 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f74062b9388190b30546cf700a825c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f73c802b848190b61a416b7488bd96 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 12:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:52 p.m.