Triple

T30033
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Cabernet Sauvignon E599 entity
Predicate foodPairing P162 FINISHED
Object red meat LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: red meat | Statement: [Cabernet Sauvignon, foodPairing, red meat]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: foodPairing
Context triple: [Cabernet Sauvignon, foodPairing, red meat]
  • A. diet
    Indicates that an entity regularly consumes a particular type or range of food as its primary source of nutrition.
  • B. traditionalCuisine
    Indicates that an entity is associated with the customary or historically rooted style of cooking and food preparation characteristic of a particular culture, region, or community.
  • C. servesAtThePleasureOf
    Indicates that one entity holds a position or role that can be terminated at any time by another entity, typically at the discretion or will of that other entity.
  • D. primaryGrapeVariety
    Indicates that one entity is the main or predominant grape variety used in producing the other entity (typically a wine or wine-based product).
  • E. complements chosen
    Indicates that one entity enhances, completes, or improves another by providing qualities or functions that fit well together.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2490d80a0819083bf604c1229e903 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2486eb01881909241540dda28e1ff completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.