Triple

T30026285
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Minyong E762889 entity
Predicate sharesLinguisticAffinityWith P10003 FINISHED
Object Adi subgroup languages LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Adi subgroup languages | Statement: [Minyong, sharesLinguisticAffinityWith, Adi subgroup languages]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesLinguisticAffinityWith
Context triple: [Minyong, sharesLinguisticAffinityWith, Adi subgroup languages]
  • A. sharesLinguisticFamilyWith
    Indicates that two languages belong to the same linguistic family or branch within a language family.
  • B. hasLanguageSimilarTo
    Indicates that one entity uses or is associated with a language that is similar or closely related to the language used or associated with another entity.
  • C. linguisticallyRelatedTo chosen
    Indicates that two entities are connected through a linguistic relationship, such as sharing a common language, origin, structure, or other language-based association.
  • D. hasCommonLoanwordsFrom
    Indicates that two languages share loanwords that originate from the same source language.
  • E. hasLinguisticAffiliation
    Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with or belongs to a particular language or linguistic group.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f2246ee6e48190b69e837b913b398a completed April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fe30bc64308190b603ff1b30c2aeee completed May 8, 2026, 6:51 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fe2f7175b081908dd61e1513620bbe completed May 8, 2026, 6:46 p.m.
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:48 p.m.