Triple
T30019672
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ashton, Maryland |
E762697
|
entity |
| Predicate | formedCommunityWith |
P198059
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Sandy Spring, Maryland |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sandy Spring, Maryland | Statement: [Ashton, Maryland, formedCommunityWith, Sandy Spring, Maryland]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: formedCommunityWith Context triple: [Ashton, Maryland, formedCommunityWith, Sandy Spring, Maryland]
-
A.
formsCommunityIn
Indicates that an entity comes together with others to establish or participate in a community within a particular context or location.
-
B.
formsBiStateCommunityWith
Indicates that two entities jointly constitute or participate in a shared bi-state community spanning both of their jurisdictions.
-
C.
associatedCommunity
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular community with which it is involved or identified.
-
D.
includesCommunity
Indicates that one entity encompasses, contains, or has within it a particular community as part of its scope or composition.
-
E.
collaboratingCommunity
Indicates that two or more entities are actively working together toward shared goals or projects as part of a community relationship.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246b0c84819094f1250b6a02d277 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fec5c503808190bde0b1829ea43071 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fec535dd6c8190a6ab85201f5a04a9 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fec5c3f8248190b835a8e4eba470c4 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:47 p.m.