Triple

T300147
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Aqua E6178 entity
Predicate notablePraise P11240 FINISHED
Object visually appealing and distinctive look LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: visually appealing and distinctive look | Statement: [Aqua, notablePraise, visually appealing and distinctive look]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notablePraise
Context triple: [Aqua, notablePraise, visually appealing and distinctive look]
  • A. notableFor
    Indicates that an entity is especially recognized or distinguished for a particular quality, achievement, characteristic, or role.
  • B. notableDuring
    Indicates that something was especially prominent, active, or significant during a particular time period or event.
  • C. notableAdvantage
    Indicates that one entity possesses a significant benefit, edge, or favorable quality over another entity or in a given context.
  • D. notablePrimary
    Indicates that one entity is the main or most prominent example, instance, or representative of another entity.
  • E. notableContribution
    Indicates that an entity has made a significant, recognized contribution to another entity, field, work, or endeavor.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea2fba548190a5aeb1597dca96bd completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e93aff048190a633c8ae2b76a41f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a2ea2af1388190b93235602ace679e completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:14 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.