Triple
T2999514
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Technical Committees of FAO |
E81152
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | technical advisory mechanism |
C12097
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: technical advisory mechanism Context triple: [Technical Committees of FAO, instanceOf, technical advisory mechanism]
-
A.
technical commission system
A technical commission system is a structured framework of processes, tools, and governance used to plan, execute, verify, and document the commissioning and performance validation of technical systems or facilities.
-
B.
technical architecture committee
A technical architecture committee is a governing body of experts responsible for defining, reviewing, and guiding an organization’s technology architecture, standards, and strategic technical decisions.
-
C.
technical standard component
A technical standard component is a defined, reusable element or module that conforms to established specifications to ensure compatibility, interoperability, and consistent performance within a larger system or standard.
-
D.
Technical specification
A technical specification is a detailed, formal document that precisely defines the functional, performance, and interface requirements of a system, component, or product to guide its design, implementation, and verification.
-
E.
technical code
Technical code is a structured set of machine-readable instructions, written in a specific programming language, that implements precise computational logic and system behavior according to defined technical requirements.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b187fc8819085914d3c9ea3142d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.