Triple

T2998262
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Château Pétrus E81122 entity
Predicate grapeComposition P11949 FINISHED
Object Merlot-dominant blend LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Merlot-dominant blend | Statement: [Château Pétrus, grapeComposition, Merlot-dominant blend]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: grapeComposition
Context triple: [Château Pétrus, grapeComposition, Merlot-dominant blend]
  • A. grapeColorProduced
    Indicates the color that is produced by or characteristic of a given grape.
  • B. grapeVarietyAllowed
    Indicates that a specific grape variety is permitted or authorized for use in a given context, such as a wine, region, or product specification.
  • C. primaryGrapeVariety
    Indicates that one entity is the main or predominant grape variety used in producing the other entity (typically a wine or wine-based product).
  • D. usesGrapeType chosen
    Indicates that one entity employs or incorporates a specific type or variety of grape in its composition, production, or process.
  • E. secondaryGrape
    Indicates that one grape variety serves as a secondary or supporting component in a wine blend relative to the primary grape.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b187fc8819085914d3c9ea3142d completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad99f766408190a5591efce8346bb9 completed March 8, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad9615fefc8190ad96da92519cb7a3 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.