Triple
T29979389
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Abui language |
E761539
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Alor–Pantar language |
C56607
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Alor–Pantar language Context triple: [Abui language, instanceOf, Alor–Pantar language]
-
A.
Minahasan language
The Minahasan language is an Austronesian language (or group of closely related dialects) traditionally spoken by the Minahasan people of North Sulawesi, Indonesia, characterized by complex verbal morphology and significant influence from Malay/Indonesian.
-
B.
Dayak language
Dayak language refers to any of the indigenous Austronesian languages spoken by the Dayak peoples of Borneo, encompassing numerous distinct but related linguistic varieties across Indonesia and Malaysia.
-
C.
Sama–Bajaw language
The Sama–Bajaw language is a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the seafaring Sama-Bajau peoples across maritime Southeast Asia, particularly in the Philippines, Malaysia, and Indonesia.
-
D.
Sahaptian language
A Sahaptian language is a member of a small family of Native American languages spoken in the Plateau region of the northwestern United States, primarily in parts of Washington, Oregon, and Idaho.
-
E.
Malaitan language
Malaitan language is a conceptual class representing any of the closely related Austronesian languages spoken on Malaita Island in the Solomon Islands, characterized by shared phonological, grammatical, and lexical features within the Southeast Solomonic subgroup.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246851148190b8e76206db94b105 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:34 p.m.