Triple
T299793
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ATA |
E6172
|
entity |
| Predicate | commandProtocol |
P1992
|
FINISHED |
| Object | task file register interface |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: task file register interface | Statement: [ATA, commandProtocol, task file register interface]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commandProtocol Context triple: [ATA, commandProtocol, task file register interface]
-
A.
commandType
Indicates the specific kind or category of command being issued or executed in the relationship.
-
B.
commands
Indicates that one entity holds authority over another and issues directives or orders that the other is expected to follow.
-
C.
protocol
chosen
Indicates that one entity defines or follows a specific set of rules or procedures governing how it interacts or communicates with another entity.
-
D.
commandSetUsedBy
Indicates that a particular command set is utilized or referenced by a given entity or system.
-
E.
commandsThrough
Indicates that one entity exercises authority or control over another indirectly, acting through an intermediary or chain of command.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9398df08190af40063a2de7a1d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.