Triple
T299764
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Serial Attached SCSI |
E6171
|
entity |
| Predicate | logicalProtocol |
P1992
|
FINISHED |
| Object | SCSI command set |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SCSI command set | Statement: [Serial Attached SCSI, logicalProtocol, SCSI command set]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: logicalProtocol Context triple: [Serial Attached SCSI, logicalProtocol, SCSI command set]
-
A.
protocol
chosen
Indicates that one entity defines or follows a specific set of rules or procedures governing how it interacts or communicates with another entity.
-
B.
secretProtocolContent
Indicates that one entity contains or represents the confidential or undisclosed details of a protocol associated with another entity.
-
C.
logicSystem
Indicates a relationship where an entity is associated with, defined within, or governed by a particular logical framework or system of formal reasoning.
-
D.
successorProtocol
Indicates that one protocol directly follows and replaces another in sequence or versioning.
-
E.
logicalForm
Indicates a relationship where an expression is associated with its structured, formal logical representation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e9398df08190af40063a2de7a1d0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.