Triple
T29968867
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic |
E761263
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesOrdinal |
P92648
|
FINISHED |
| Object | epsilon_0 (ε₀) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: epsilon_0 (ε₀) | Statement: [Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic, usesOrdinal, epsilon_0 (ε₀)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesOrdinal Context triple: [Gentzen’s consistency proof for arithmetic, usesOrdinal, epsilon_0 (ε₀)]
-
A.
usedOrdinal
chosen
Indicates that one entity is used as an ordinal indicator or position marker relative to another entity.
-
B.
ordinalNumber
Indicates the position or rank of an entity within an ordered sequence (e.g., first, second, third).
-
C.
isRecursiveOrdinal
Indicates that an ordinal has the property of being recursive, meaning its order structure can be fully described or generated by a computable (recursive) process.
-
D.
orderOf
Indicates that one entity is arranged, ranked, or sequenced before or after another according to a specified ordering criterion.
-
E.
isLimitOrdinal
Indicates that an ordinal is a limit ordinal, i.e., it is nonzero and has no immediate predecessor, being the limit of all smaller ordinals.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22467626081908d5afea489590e96 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6786c984c8190b7668a6232901b30 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:19 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:31 p.m.