Triple
T29950189
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | "Alejandro" (The Sound of Arrows Remix) |
E760745
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasRemixArtistType |
P201945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | duo |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: duo | Statement: ["Alejandro" (The Sound of Arrows Remix), hasRemixArtistType, duo]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasRemixArtistType Context triple: ["Alejandro" (The Sound of Arrows Remix), hasRemixArtistType, duo]
-
A.
hasRemixArtistDescriptor
Indicates that an entity has an associated descriptor specifying the artist responsible for a remix version of it.
-
B.
hasRemixType
Indicates that one creative work is a remix of another, specifying the particular type or style of remix relationship between them.
-
C.
hasRemixProducer
Indicates that one entity serves as the producer responsible for creating a remix version of another entity (typically a musical work).
-
D.
hasRemix
Indicates that one creative work is a remix version derived from or based on another work.
-
E.
hasRemixGenre
Indicates that a work or track has a remix version characterized by a particular musical genre.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246562b881909d57622f4086d43d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00383e868c819098fd17e25fcbdb04 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:48 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a0037cc59688190b7b9da939a413db3 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:46 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_6a00383d83c08190af7bc00f17affd97 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:48 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:25 p.m.