Triple
T29913667
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | attempted to vote for John Kasich for president in 2016 |
E759734
|
entity |
| Predicate | subsequentJudicialOutcome |
P2931
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Tenth Circuit initially ruled in favor of elector autonomy in Baca v. Colorado |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tenth Circuit initially ruled in favor of elector autonomy in Baca v. Colorado | Statement: [attempted to vote for John Kasich for president in 2016, subsequentJudicialOutcome, Tenth Circuit initially ruled in favor of elector autonomy in Baca v. Colorado]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: subsequentJudicialOutcome Context triple: [attempted to vote for John Kasich for president in 2016, subsequentJudicialOutcome, Tenth Circuit initially ruled in favor of elector autonomy in Baca v. Colorado]
-
A.
legalOutcome
chosen
Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
-
B.
subsequentCase
Indicates that one legal case follows another in time or procedural order, often relying on or referencing the earlier case.
-
C.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
-
D.
outcomeOf
Indicates that one entity is the result, consequence, or product that arises from another entity, event, or process.
-
E.
laterCourt
Indicates that one court decision or proceeding occurs at a later time than another court decision or proceeding.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f2246189fc8190996b63ee1f9a2374 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6775c80548190bd6329cb919a921c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:11 p.m.