Triple
T29909822
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Garganta la Olla |
E759648
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAutonomousCommunityCode |
P180148
|
FINISHED |
| Object | ES-EX |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: ES-EX | Statement: [Garganta la Olla, hasAutonomousCommunityCode, ES-EX]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAutonomousCommunityCode Context triple: [Garganta la Olla, hasAutonomousCommunityCode, ES-EX]
-
A.
inAutonomousCommunity
Indicates that one entity is located within or belongs administratively to a specific autonomous community.
-
B.
associatedAutonomousCommunity
Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or belongs to a specific autonomous community as its relevant regional jurisdiction or affiliation.
-
C.
isAutonomousCommunityCapital
Indicates that a city serves as the capital of an autonomous community within a country.
-
D.
hasMunicipalityCode
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific official municipality code used for administrative or identification purposes.
-
E.
hasMunicipalCodeAuthority
Indicates that an entity has the official power or jurisdiction to create, adopt, or enforce municipal codes, ordinances, or regulations.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f224600590819085e148a01c056ef6 |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f73223675481908c1bc3208c0f5284 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7317690108190b3aae2cd2e1d069e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:28 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f73221eef88190bd8905e6e9f5a586 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11:31 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 6:09 p.m.