Triple
T2986491
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Presidency of Turkey |
E80637
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalAmendment |
P5553
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum | Statement: [Presidency of Turkey, constitutionalAmendment, 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalAmendment Context triple: [Presidency of Turkey, constitutionalAmendment, 2017 Turkish constitutional referendum]
-
A.
constitutionalChange
chosen
Indicates a formal modification, addition, or removal of provisions within a constitution or foundational legal framework.
-
B.
constitutionalAmendmentInvolved
Indicates that a specific constitutional amendment is directly relevant to, affects, or is implicated in the described situation, case, or action.
-
C.
canAmendConstitution
Indicates that an entity has the authority or power to modify or revise a constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalAmendmentNumber
Indicates the specific numerical designation assigned to a particular constitutional amendment within a legal or constitutional framework.
-
E.
proposedAmendment
Indicates that one entity has formally suggested a change or addition (an amendment) to another entity, such as a document, law, or agreement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b16c3488190b47b6aa7a59a335b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad99c76dfc8190b08bd6110ffabf25 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad9611fc348190a5d17d237f653f60 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:59 p.m.