Triple
T29797839
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pietilä |
E756600
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOfNamingTradition |
P45665
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Finnish naming customs |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Finnish naming customs | Statement: [Pietilä, partOfNamingTradition, Finnish naming customs]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: partOfNamingTradition Context triple: [Pietilä, partOfNamingTradition, Finnish naming customs]
-
A.
partOfOnomasticTradition
chosen
Indicates that something belongs to, or is included within, a particular onomastic (name-giving) tradition.
-
B.
belongsToNamingTradition
Indicates that an entity is associated with or classified under a particular naming tradition or convention.
-
C.
namedAccordingTo
Indicates that one entity is given a name that follows, references, or is derived from another entity or source.
-
D.
partOfOnomasticsCategory
Indicates that one concept or term belongs to, or is classified under, a specific category within the field of onomastics (the study of names).
-
E.
pairedTraditionalName
Indicates that two entities are associated as a traditional name pair, typically used together or in customary combination within a cultural or naming convention.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22454583081908927516cb9938d1d |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fec00f27988190955de6b6348a4d97 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:03 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69febd52037c8190b475dbd50fdbc13e |
completed | May 9, 2026, 4:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:16 p.m.