Triple
T29787405
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Moïse Amyraut |
E756301
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Traité de la prédestination
Traité de la prédestination is a 17th-century theological work that articulates Moïse Amyraut’s influential formulation of hypothetical universalism within Reformed theology.
|
E1884939
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Traité de la prédestination | Statement: [Moïse Amyraut, notableWork, Traité de la prédestination]
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Traité de la prédestination Triple: [Moïse Amyraut, notableWork, Traité de la prédestination]
Generated description
Traité de la prédestination is a 17th-century theological work that articulates Moïse Amyraut’s influential formulation of hypothetical universalism within Reformed theology.
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f22451fb748190bbdbab401280affb |
completed | April 29, 2026, 3:31 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f674abd4bc81908993a7677238b80c |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:03 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a26c903f0a8819086ca5f19e74f15e4 |
completed | June 8, 2026, 1:52 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a26cd43832c819092f8bc754b39c134 |
completed | June 8, 2026, 2:10 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a26db51b0a08190ba22629669e8fbc2 |
completed | June 8, 2026, 3:10 p.m. |
Created at: April 29, 2026, 5:09 p.m.