Triple
T29722225
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Quatuor Ysaÿe |
E752086
|
entity |
| Predicate | artisticQuality |
P16367
|
FINISHED |
| Object | refined interpretations |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: refined interpretations | Statement: [Quatuor Ysaÿe, artisticQuality, refined interpretations]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: artisticQuality Context triple: [Quatuor Ysaÿe, artisticQuality, refined interpretations]
-
A.
artisticCharacteristic
chosen
Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a particular artistic quality, style, or trait in relation to another.
-
B.
artisticField
Indicates the artistic domain or creative discipline in which an entity is active or associated.
-
C.
hasArtisticRelevance
Indicates that something bears meaningful artistic significance or contributes in a relevant way to artistic value, interpretation, or context.
-
D.
hasArtisticLevel
Indicates the degree or quality of artistic skill, sophistication, or creativity associated with an entity.
-
E.
artisticAmbition
Indicates a desire or drive to create, achieve, or excel in artistic or creative pursuits.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67d3624248190a36a9b2d2e9778d4 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f678ce54b081908c26edfd49e39c60 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:37 p.m.