Triple

T29717702
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Prince of Peremyshl E751960 entity
Predicate hasFrontierRole P174715 FINISHED
Object border defense LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: border defense | Statement: [Prince of Peremyshl, hasFrontierRole, border defense]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFrontierRole
Context triple: [Prince of Peremyshl, hasFrontierRole, border defense]
  • A. hasQuadrantRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific functional or positional role within a defined quadrant of a larger structure or system.
  • B. hasPlayingRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in an activity, event, or performance in a specific playing role or capacity.
  • C. hasNotableRoleIn
    Indicates that an entity holds a significant or noteworthy role or function within another entity, event, work, or context.
  • D. hasEntranceRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in an entrance or access point with a specific functional role or capacity.
  • E. hasGlobalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a role or permission set that applies across an entire system or domain, rather than being limited to a specific scope or context.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6c5b7e46081909975b05f7298cc0e completed May 3, 2026, 3:49 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6c3f23ae081909a52801266063a3c completed May 3, 2026, 3:41 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6c49069e48190a3486b6254a6645b completed May 3, 2026, 3:44 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:35 p.m.