Triple
T29717484
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Courts of Appeal of Sudan |
E751953
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayRemandCasesTo |
P12548
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lower courts of Sudan |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lower courts of Sudan | Statement: [Courts of Appeal of Sudan, mayRemandCasesTo, lower courts of Sudan]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayRemandCasesTo Context triple: [Courts of Appeal of Sudan, mayRemandCasesTo, lower courts of Sudan]
-
A.
canRemand
chosen
Indicates that an authority (such as a court or decision-maker) has the power to send a case or matter back to a lower body or earlier stage for further action or reconsideration.
-
B.
mayReferMattersTo
Indicates that one party has the option or authority to direct or escalate certain issues, cases, or concerns to another party or body for consideration or action.
-
C.
mayProsecute
Indicates that one party has the legal authority or permission to initiate and conduct prosecution against another party.
-
D.
mayGrantLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that an authority has the power or discretion to allow a party to proceed with an appeal.
-
E.
requiresLeaveToAppeal
Indicates that a party must obtain formal permission from a higher court before proceeding with an appeal.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0d628c00c8190ab5ee7e423d7ec3c |
completed | April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f672dd9ab881908969657a9bd48098 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:55 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659f246081909821c5f452d14e8f |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:34 p.m.