Triple

T29694102
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Type I string theory E751295 entity
Predicate relatedBySdualityTo P167827 FINISHED
Object SO(32) heterotic string theory NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: SO(32) heterotic string theory | Statement: [Type I string theory, relatedBySdualityTo, SO(32) heterotic string theory]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatedBySdualityTo
Context triple: [Type I string theory, relatedBySdualityTo, SO(32) heterotic string theory]
  • A. allyRelation
    Indicates a cooperative, supportive relationship in which the entities act as allies toward shared or aligned goals.
  • B. relatedByFormula
    Indicates that one entity is mathematically or logically derived from, or connected to, another according to a specific formula.
  • C. hasTdualityPartner chosen
    Indicates that one entity is related to another as its T-dual counterpart, typically under T-duality transformations in string theory.
  • D. isRelatedToMTheoryViaDualities
    Indicates that one theoretical framework is connected to M-theory through a chain or network of dualities, such as string dualities or field-theory dualities.
  • E. relatedTo
    Indicates a general, non-specific relationship or association exists between two entities.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d625b09481909b0b69aea1e846c8 completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a019579463c8190b51e39183b57bbaf completed May 11, 2026, 8:38 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a0192d309488190a3d86c93e7138c77 completed May 11, 2026, 8:26 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:19 p.m.