Triple

T29679341
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ergamenes E750908 entity
Predicate possibleSameAs P104759 FINISHED
Object Arkamani I NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Arkamani I | Statement: [Ergamenes, possibleSameAs, Arkamani I]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: possibleSameAs
Context triple: [Ergamenes, possibleSameAs, Arkamani I]
  • A. samePersonAs
    Indicates that two referenced entities are in fact the very same individual, not just similar or related.
  • B. alternativeIdentification
    Indicates that one entity serves as an alternative identifier or reference for another entity.
  • C. hasAlternativeNameForSameCity
    Indicates that one city name is an alternative or variant name referring to the same city as another name.
  • D. similarCredentialAs
    Indicates that one credential is considered equivalent or closely matching another in terms of content, level, or recognition.
  • E. likelyVariantOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is probably a variant, version, or alternative form of another entity, based on available evidence or similarity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0d624d7b08190ba237d226f78d0d9 completed April 28, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6a0ea04888190ac3a813b603bcb5c completed May 3, 2026, 1:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f69fe463248190aa78128abeab1183 completed May 3, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:09 p.m.