Triple
T29648293
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2010 |
E756064
|
entity |
| Predicate | previousHolderParty |
P194607
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Democratic Party |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Democratic Party | Statement: [United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2010, previousHolderParty, Democratic Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: previousHolderParty Context triple: [United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2010, previousHolderParty, Democratic Party]
-
A.
previousRepresentativeParty
Indicates that a given party previously served as the representative party for another entity before the current representative was in place.
-
B.
previousLargestParty
Indicates that one political party was the largest party immediately before another party became the largest.
-
C.
lastHolder
Indicates that the subject is the most recent entity to have possessed, owned, or held the object.
-
D.
officeHolderBeforeParty
Indicates that one office holder preceded another in holding the same office before a specified political party came into power or became relevant.
-
E.
firstHolderParty
Indicates that the referenced party is the initial or original holder in the specified relationship or arrangement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0ef89d2c88190a6d0d5116ccd7cc9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd7e364a648190a1e9e1d9fc76e99e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7bb547608190a3b04dddbca6b8bc |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:59 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd7e35967081909f8bc8389d976ffd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:09 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:51 p.m.