Triple
T2964066
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Prince Edward County, Virginia |
E80118
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWithCourtCase |
P17092
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County |
E10749
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County | Statement: [Prince Edward County, Virginia, associatedWithCourtCase, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County Context triple: [Prince Edward County, Virginia, associatedWithCourtCase, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County]
-
A.
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County
chosen
Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County was a landmark civil rights case challenging racial segregation in Virginia’s public schools that became one of the five cases consolidated into the U.S. Supreme Court’s Brown v. Board of Education decision.
-
B.
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County is a landmark 1968 U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened school desegregation by rejecting ineffective “freedom-of-choice” plans and requiring proactive steps to dismantle dual school systems.
-
C.
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that held individuals are protected from retaliation when they complain about sex discrimination in educational programs receiving federal funding.
-
D.
Brown v. Board of Education
Brown v. Board of Education is the landmark 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision that declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, overturning the “separate but equal” doctrine.
-
E.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education is a landmark 1971 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the use of busing and broad equitable powers by federal courts to achieve racial desegregation in public schools.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: associatedWithCourtCase Context triple: [Prince Edward County, Virginia, associatedWithCourtCase, Davis v. County School Board of Prince Edward County]
-
A.
associatedWithCourt
Indicates a relationship in which an entity is linked or connected to a specific court, such as through jurisdiction, affiliation, or involvement in legal proceedings.
-
B.
associatedCourtCase
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked to, or involved in, a particular court case.
-
C.
relatedCase
Indicates that one legal case is connected or associated with another case, such as through shared facts, parties, issues, or procedural history.
-
D.
legalCaseOutcomeAssociatedWith
Indicates that a particular legal case outcome is connected or linked to a specific related entity, such as a case, party, or legal proceeding.
-
E.
affectedCourt
Indicates that a particular court is impacted or influenced by a specified action, decision, or legal matter.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1341848190bd19dbf46892887d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad9958b1e48190a77f37bf63333c5b |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b0fc98d94481908282d21394dc24a7 |
completed | March 11, 2026, 5:24 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ad960e71f8819088179d11248c6ed0 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:58 p.m.