Triple

T29627077
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Commander-in-Chief, West Indies Station E755172 entity
Predicate hasTypicalRank P9317 FINISHED
Object rear admiral LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: rear admiral | Statement: [Commander-in-Chief, West Indies Station, hasTypicalRank, rear admiral]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalRank
Context triple: [Commander-in-Chief, West Indies Station, hasTypicalRank, rear admiral]
  • A. typicalRank chosen
    Indicates the usual or most common rank or position an entity holds within a given ordering or hierarchy.
  • B. typicalRankPrefix
    Indicates that one entity is a commonly used or standard prefix attached to the rank represented by the other entity.
  • C. typicalRankRange
    Indicates the usual or most common range of ranks or ordered positions that an entity typically occupies within a ranking or hierarchy.
  • D. hasRankOverℂ
    Indicates that one entity has a specified (typically finite) linear-algebraic rank when considered over the field of complex numbers ℂ.
  • E. hasRankNumber
    Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific ordinal or hierarchical position represented by a numerical rank.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0ef86b6ec8190a87fff07fd983b1e completed April 28, 2026, 5:33 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd8ccbd4c88190b13aae0673b3c821 completed May 8, 2026, 7:12 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd8ae2227c819089546f5c3629799e completed May 8, 2026, 7:04 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 6:38 p.m.