Triple
T2961483
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. |
E80058
|
entity |
| Predicate | partyTo |
P1790
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius |
E15928
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius | Statement: [Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., partyTo, Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius Context triple: [Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., partyTo, Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius]
-
A.
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
chosen
Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
-
B.
King v. Burwell
King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
-
C.
NFIB v. Sebelius
NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
-
D.
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt is a 2016 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down Texas abortion restrictions as imposing an undue burden on women’s constitutional right to access abortion.
-
E.
Stenberg v. Carhart
Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1341848190bd19dbf46892887d |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ad995454448190834aa5d47a4ed5ac |
completed | March 8, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b1de92f04c8190967ec290cba891a6 |
completed | March 11, 2026, 9:28 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:57 p.m.