Triple

T2957387
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject indigenous peoples of Mexico E79965 entity
Predicate languageFamilyDiversity P16608 FINISHED
Object high LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high | Statement: [indigenous peoples of Mexico, languageFamilyDiversity, high]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: languageFamilyDiversity
Context triple: [indigenous peoples of Mexico, languageFamilyDiversity, high]
  • A. languageDiversity chosen
    Indicates the degree to which multiple distinct languages are present and used within a given context or population.
  • B. languageFamilyDominant
    Indicates that one language family holds a primary or prevailing status over others within a given context (such as a region, population, or system).
  • C. languageFamily
    Indicates that two or more languages belong to the same genealogical language family or linguistic lineage.
  • D. languageFamilyStatus
    Indicates the classification or recognition status of a language within a particular language family (e.g., primary, branch, extinct, or disputed).
  • E. languageFamilyOf
    Indicates that one entity is the language family to which the other entity (a specific language) belongs.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad8b1276588190a374a0b12e0f7bdf completed March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ad992b33e081909d22a19d5064c47d completed March 8, 2026, 3:43 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ad960c5c8881909d679912bd7d78f3 completed March 8, 2026, 3:30 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:57 p.m.