Triple
T2954476
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States dollar (North Carolina dollar at par with Spanish dollar) |
E79898
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | historical currency arrangement |
C1004
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: historical currency arrangement Context triple: [United States dollar (North Carolina dollar at par with Spanish dollar), instanceOf, historical currency arrangement]
-
A.
former currency
chosen
A former currency is a type of money that was once officially issued and used as legal tender by a country or region but has since been replaced or discontinued.
-
B.
fiat currency precursor
A fiat currency precursor is an early or transitional form of money—such as government-issued notes partially backed by commodities or enforced by decree—that paved the way for fully unbacked, state-authorized fiat currencies.
-
C.
international monetary system
The international monetary system is the set of rules, institutions, and arrangements that govern how countries manage exchange rates, conduct cross-border payments, and coordinate their monetary and financial relations.
-
D.
fiat currency
A fiat currency is a government-issued form of money that has value primarily because a government maintains it and people have faith in its acceptance, rather than being backed by a physical commodity like gold or silver.
-
E.
monetary system
A monetary system is the structured framework of institutions, rules, instruments, and practices a society uses to create, manage, and exchange money as a medium of value.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b1276588190a374a0b12e0f7bdf |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:57 p.m.