Triple

T29504401
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject alpha–beta pruning E748469 entity
Predicate commonlyAppliedIn P11801 FINISHED
Object computer chess LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: computer chess | Statement: [alpha–beta pruning, commonlyAppliedIn, computer chess]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: commonlyAppliedIn
Context triple: [alpha–beta pruning, commonlyAppliedIn, computer chess]
  • A. widelyUsedIn chosen
    Indicates that something is commonly or extensively utilized within a particular context, domain, or group.
  • B. appliedPrimarilyTo
    Indicates that something is used mainly or chiefly in relation to a particular target, context, or purpose, rather than being used broadly or equally elsewhere.
  • C. commonApplication
    Indicates that multiple entities share or participate in the same application, process, or usage context.
  • D. appliesPrimarilyTo
    Indicates that a property, rule, or characteristic is mainly relevant or intended for a particular entity or group, more than for others.
  • E. appliesVia
    Indicates that an action, rule, or effect is carried out, implemented, or achieved through a specified method, medium, or mechanism.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f0bd455a9c8190b40a3e8ea38cf61f completed April 28, 2026, 1:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd37b695c88190855801626f91c4cd completed May 8, 2026, 1:09 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd374cccf08190a230e87164af5938 completed May 8, 2026, 1:07 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:26 p.m.