Triple
T29413199
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Polish–French relations in the 18th century |
E745951
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | aspect of French history |
C55574
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: aspect of French history Context triple: [Polish–French relations in the 18th century, instanceOf, aspect of French history]
-
A.
aspect of English history
An aspect of English history is a distinct theme, period, event, or social development that illustrates and helps explain the political, cultural, economic, or institutional evolution of England over time.
-
B.
history of the French Revolution
The history of the French Revolution examines the political, social, economic, and cultural causes, events, and consequences of the upheaval in France from 1789 to 1799 that transformed the nation and influenced modern democratic and revolutionary movements worldwide.
-
C.
event of the French Revolution
An event of the French Revolution is a historically specific occurrence between 1789 and 1799 in France that significantly influenced the revolution’s political, social, or cultural trajectory.
-
D.
Frankish history event
A Frankish history event is a significant occurrence involving the Frankish peoples, kingdoms, or rulers that shaped the political, social, or cultural development of early medieval Western Europe.
-
E.
event in French economic history
A significant occurrence or development within France’s economic past that influenced production, trade, finance, policy, or broader socioeconomic conditions.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0a79f6d5c8190a350baed0157e06f |
completed | April 28, 2026, 12:27 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 2:59 p.m.