Triple
T293538
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Chilean flag |
E6044
|
entity |
| Predicate | symbolizesColorWhite |
P129
|
FINISHED |
| Object | snow of the Andes Mountains |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: snow of the Andes Mountains | Statement: [Chilean flag, symbolizesColorWhite, snow of the Andes Mountains]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: symbolizesColorWhite Context triple: [Chilean flag, symbolizesColorWhite, snow of the Andes Mountains]
-
A.
symbolizes
chosen
Indicates that one entity stands for, represents, or is used as a sign for another entity, concept, or idea.
-
B.
colors
Indicates that one entity assigns, describes, or provides the color or colors of another entity.
-
C.
colorCharge
Indicates a relationship where an entity possesses a specific quantum color charge (such as red, green, or blue) in the context of strong nuclear interactions.
-
D.
partyColor
Indicates the political party affiliation or ideological group with which an entity is associated, typically represented by a specific color.
-
E.
colorOftenUsed
Indicates that a particular color is frequently used or commonly applied in relation to something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a2e934b4408190b53a17f57a02df65 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.